//
you're reading...
Annotated, Everything, Photos, Resident Nerd

marginal

The other morning I was reading this thing that appeared in my NPR Books feed (don’t you subscribe to National Public Radio book talk? what are you? not a nerd?): Chat While Reading: The Future of Books? It’s about this site, called BookGlutton.com, where you are able to discuss books as you read them. Provided you’re reading the digital public-domain copies on the site. I checked it out, sort of. I didn’t sign up for the site, but I clicked through a book to get an idea of how it worked. So, there’s the book, and on the left is a chat window (which is only enabled if you’re signed up and logged in, so I don’t know how lively it is), and you can click on any passage in the book and on the right, any notes that have been written by others will appear. I don’t know if this feature is also only viewable if you’re signed up and logged in; if it is, then I suppose there would be notes there, and if it’s not, then people sure aren’t communicating much. Also I wonder if you have to keep going back to click through the passages you’ve noted to see if anyone else has written anything or if the site notifies you somehow. I suppose I can’t talk about this site much one way or the other without signing up, but I don’t really feel like signing up for it — I have enough accounts on enough websites to keep track of as it is. But the main reason is that nobody wants to read my margin notes, as they are random and generally unhelpful. Also sometimes snarky.

Allow me to share:

In the Aeneid:

notesaeneid

I mean, I suppose we can argue that Virgil is generally not cool, but I don’t really feel like arguing about it. Let’s not fight.

In The Sound and the Fury:

notesfaulkner

Right? I know.

In Gulliver’s Travels:

notesgulliver

Allow me to explain. I read this for a class. (Of course I did. As amusing as he may sometimes be, does anybody sit around reading Jonathan Swift just because? If you do, that’s cool, I guess, but you may be the only person in the world who does. Just saying.) The professor spent an inordinate amount of time explaining the bit about Gulliver’s teacher (Master Bates — get it? GET IT?!? MASTER BATES!! Oh, Jonathan Swift, you CARD!) and how he died after Gulliver married. We could talk about how Master Bates probably only faked his death after Gulliver married, but you know, let’s not.

In Macbeth:

notesmacbeth

I don’t have anything to say about this.

In Mansfield Park:

notesmansfield

Um. Sorry. Spoiler alert? But do you honestly think Fanny Price and Edmund Bertram could have interesting (let alone good) sex? Really?

In the Gregory Corso poem “Marriage”:

notesmarriage

Should I get married? Should I be good? Or…

There are more, certainly, but I got tired of looking for them. Yes, sometimes I write in books. Not nearly as much as I used to, but even so, I know that some people think of writing in books as a form of literary abuse, but I like to think of it as, um, not literary abuse. I find margin notes amusing, actually, because when I reread books, which I do sometimes, and I find a note I wrote a long time ago, it often reminds me of something. Though sometimes I just wonder what the hell I was going on about. Like how on one page of The Sound and the Fury, it just says “Solipsistic” and nothing else. It could’ve been a comment on Jason Compson, or it could’ve just been that I thought of that word for something else and wanted to write it down and didn’t have any other paper handy. Knowing myself, either scenario is equally likely.

But it’s weird finding other people’s notes in books. I remember when I was 12 or so, and my grandmother bought a house. The people who moved out left boxes of books in the basement, and I remember going through them and picking out things to read. One of the books was Even Cowgirls Get the Blues, and aside from the fact that I was too young for Tom Robbins when I was 12, the book was full of underlining and notes, usually in the sex scenes. I kept wondering why the person had underlined those passages and left other passages unmarked, before I just decided, in all my 12-year-old wisdom, that whoever had done all that underlining must just like sex a lot. 1

I’m not sure what the takeaway lesson is here today, if in fact there is a lesson at all (probably not). But maybe it’s that if you underline only sex scenes in a book, someday some kid is going to find it and think you’re a weirdo. Or something. Do you even write in books?

_______________________________________________________
1. Thanks to the Human Growth and Reproduction classes I took in elementary school, which included the special time when one of the teachers asked a roomful of confused and slightly terrified 8-year-old girls if any of us masturbated, and the general reaction was “I’m supposed to do what to my what?” (we also learned that nipples weren’t just for breastfeeding, and perhaps this is proof that I went to some kind of crazy hippie school), I’d already been educated about sex. Somewhat. So reading the sex scenes in Even Cowgirls Get the Blues didn’t particularly faze me (except it wasn’t like in those books we had in class where the cuddly blushing naked people would hug and then hide under the covers), except I remember thinking it was weird that someone went to the trouble of underlining everything, especially since this person (I mean, at this point I’m just assuming it was the same person) had already dog-eared the pages.

Discussion

6 Responses to “marginal”

  1. Not as a general rule, but I once read a book that was so bad that partway through, I went back to the beginning and started making notes in the margins. Then I gave it to a friend who added her own notes and she passed it to another friend who made her own notes… that made a terrible book much more enjoyable because I had everyone else’s sarcastic reactions in the margins.

    Posted by srah | July 6, 2009, 11:51 am
  2. The only books I’ve ever made notes in are those I was reading for class. I needed those notes in order to go back and write papers, but they made it impossible for me to re-read the book for pleasure later on.

    Posted by Fraulein N | July 6, 2009, 4:22 pm
  3. I’m of the opinion that Macbeth was mostly paranoid, which led to his gradual slide into insanity. He also had daughters. Read into that whatever you will.

    However, I do think that Macbeth, like most of Wild Bill’s other plays, provides mountains of insight into what goes on out there and in here.

    Posted by You can call me, 'Sir' | July 7, 2009, 10:38 am
  4. srah — See, that’s an awesome idea. I want to steal it and form a Terrible Book Club, but… I probably won’t.

    Fraulein N — Yeah, most of my notes are because of classes and paper writing, but some of them aren’t. I carried on the tradition of writing in my books for awhile, before I remembered that I could, you know, just read a book without studying it. These days, I will occasionally note things if they really strike me, and also if I have some sort of writing utensil handy.

    Sir — This particular note is next to the “Is this a dagger which I see before me” soliloquy, and I’m not sure, but it might actually be a verbatim quote from the professor, as he would pose questions like that, my favorite ever being, “That’s weird, isn’t it? What’s up with that anyway?” In any case, when it comes to the dagger, is Macbeth nuts or is it a real dagger? Is he hallucinating some kind of ghost dagger or is he talking about an actual dagger that’s, I don’t know, lying on the table? Or maybe he can see the handle poking up out of his boot. (Isn’t the boot the proper place for the concealment of daggers?) It’s not really clear. And I’ve watched a lot of film clips of this scene (not because I wanted to, either) and I think it was in the Orson Welles version where he followed around a hallucinated dagger that’s just floating in the air in front of him (and obviously, because the film was made in the 1940s, the effect was totally realistic). I don’t know. In closing, oh that wacky Shakespeare.

    Posted by jamelah | July 8, 2009, 9:37 am
  5. I would join a Terrible Book Club. The problem is finding a book that is bad enough that you want to keep reading to see how much worse it can get, as opposed to a book that is bad, so you put it down and don’t read it at all.

    Posted by srah | July 8, 2009, 3:35 pm
  6. I really do love the idea of a Terrible Book Club. Maybe I will do some research into this and see if there’s some interest and some nominees for the inaugural terrible book.

    Posted by jamelah | July 8, 2009, 7:40 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

Please log in to WordPress.com to post a comment to your blog.

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 486 other followers