Woody Allen wrote this “review” in 1975. I find it equally appropriate for all cinema:
“…the part of the doctor was played with gusto and verve and the girl had a delightful cameo role. A puckish satire of contemporary mores. A droll spoof aimed more at the heart than the head. “
Definitely the right tool for the job, though.
Posted by Andy C | January 19, 2011, 12:36 amHi.
Posted by Mister Feeny | January 19, 2011, 3:43 amHi!
Posted by acwmaiden | January 19, 2011, 10:12 amHey, Buster Keaton didn’t need no stinkin’ audio. Captions were good enough for him. Did you hear him complain? No.
But, of course, he didn’t have audio, so how would we know? So never mind.
Posted by greg | January 19, 2011, 11:01 amBest 3 minutes spent today. Only time I’ve smiled all day. A whole 3 minutes of smiling. I feel better already. So thanks for that.
Posted by lisa | January 19, 2011, 1:36 pmAndy — You know, nobody has ever said that to me before.
Mister Feeny — Hi.
acwmaiden — Hello!
Greg — Yeah, no audio. I bet that Keaton dude complained ALL THE TIME. Who can prove me wrong?
Lisa — Well, that makes me smile. Thanks!
Posted by jamelah | January 19, 2011, 4:58 pmHahahaha….
Posted by Jason | January 20, 2011, 2:42 amhi
sure i drop by to see what’s going on
seeing is good
hearing is extra
….fine with me….
Posted by judih | January 21, 2011, 7:06 amI’m sorry, I’m in the wrong place. I thought this was a site with World Sex Domination tips.
Posted by Kevin | January 21, 2011, 2:04 pmWoody Allen wrote this “review” in 1975. I find it equally appropriate for all cinema:
“…the part of the doctor was played with gusto and verve and the girl had a delightful cameo role. A puckish satire of contemporary mores. A droll spoof aimed more at the heart than the head. “
Posted by Steven D. | January 25, 2011, 10:48 amAh, who needs the sound anyway just watching those facial expressions is priceless, you are exceedingly cute even when you’re not trying.
Posted by PJ | February 6, 2011, 3:50 am